But if I say, “I will not remember Him or speak anymore in His name,” then in my heart it becomes like a burning fire shut up in my bones; and I am weary of holding it in, and I cannot endure it. (Jeremiah 20:9)

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Elders and the Church


What is an elder?

            The concept of Elder (aged, mature, example among the people) is definitely tied to the concept of overseer (supervisor, looks after) and shepherd (pastoring the flock).  However, in I Peter 5, Elder is the noun, oversight and shepherd are the verbs.  We should be careful not to assign titles where they are unnecessary.  The less titles in the church the better.
            Taking a broad overview of scripture leads me to this conclusion.  Elders are mature men of the faith, equipped and called by God to set an example for the church in word and deed.
            This means that they are to be examples of what it is to follow Christ, prior to being recognized as an elder.  Whether it is an outsider or part of the family, others should look at an elder and think, “that is what it means to be a Christian.”  Not perfection, but a Gospel-centered, humble lifestyle that seeks to give God glory in every area.
            It also means that they should already be teaching others how to follow Christ.  They should be leading a Gospel Community, regularly involved with both believers and unbelievers.  All of their relationships should be intentional disciple making relationships.  One should be recognized as an elder among the people, not handed a title.

What does an elder do?

            In 1 Timothy 3, the term elder is not used, but the noun form of overseer is.  The description of this “office” is very similar to Titus 1 where Paul writes about elders.  It is probably safe to assume that the usage of Elder and Overseer is fairly interchangeable.  This makes a great deal of sense based on the OT usage of elders.  They were to look after the people, make judgments, and lead families in following God’s ways.
            It would seem that the responsibility of an elder should be to oversee the Gospel Communities.  This is where we live out our faith.  The best way to do this would be through two methods.

1)  Coaching the Gospel Community leaders in a cluster
2)  Meeting regularly to discuss matters related to the extended church family (teaching, discipline, support, planting, sending, etc)

            Elders, like everyone else in the church, should work within their gifting.  Some are teachers, some are pastors, some are prophets, etc.  No two elders are alike.  We must celebrate our differences so we can become a more holistic body.  Because of this, some elders will be paid by the church, some will not.  Some will focus on the gathering, some on church planting, some on global missions, some on gospel communities.  It will depend largely on their gifting by the Spirit.  What a freeing concept!


How do we recognize elders?

            As mentioned before, men become elders not through titles or elections, but through living as an example.  Therefore, we do not appoint, approve, or vote in an elder, rather we recognize elders that God has raised up.  They should be confirmed through a system.
            I Timothy 3 says, “if anyone aspires to the office of overseer, he desires a noble task.”  The aspiration to be recognized as an elder should first come from the individual.  They may be encouraged by others and even “recruited” by current elders, but ultimately the individual should have to take the first step.
            Once they have submitted themselves, the elders should conduct a thorough investigation.  How are they doing leading their family?  How are they doing leading their Gospel Community?  What kind of reputation do they have at work or in their neighborhood?  This process should involve interviewing both the potential elder, his family, his Gospel Community, and several outsiders.
            After enough information has been gathered about the potential elder, the elder body should discuss whether the individual meets the criteria of scripture.  There are other factors that should come into play as well.  The 4 C’s (from North Point):
            -Character (I Tim 3, Titus 1, and I Peter 5)
            -Competence (can they coach others and teach people)
            -Chemistry (is “now” the right time for them with the current team)
            -Culture (do we agree doctrinally and philosophically)

How long should an elder serve?

            When we see the church as family, this question seems a bit odd.  Eldership is a role that the elder should continually aspire to.  In fact, if at any point he does not want the responsibility of eldership, he has neglected the first qualification in I Timothy 3.  Elders are elders for life, because that is who they are.
            However, because being an elder is based on who you are and not what you do, if the individual ceases to be worthy of the recognition of elder, he should also be stripped of the title.  All elders should be formally evaluated yearly and informally evaluated every day.  If the elder is failing to fulfill his calling as an elder, he needs to repent and take appropriate action.  If he refuses to act on his own, then the other elders must take actions to bring him to repentance and reconciliation.

4 comments:

  1. This is a quite interesting and thought-provoking take on eldership. I find myself agreeing with you whole-heartedly, but I must propose a question:
    Eldership is the direct result of a personal aspiration to a holier (more set-apart) standard of faith and life. The life and leadership of elders should naturally raise up more men who desire to be elders, right? What is to be said for the "plateaued" congregation, the one who has no aspiring elders?

    ReplyDelete
  2. That is a great question, one that actually led to writing this blog. I said this recently (credit to the Holy Spirit not myself), "elders are called to make disciples, not decisions." If an elder is not making disciples, then they are not raising up more elders.

    What really began to convict me on this subject was Titus. Paul instructs Titus to put in place what remained. He then immediately moves to the subject of eldership, citing the laziness of the Cretians for their inability to protect against false teaching and living. If there are NO men aspiring to the office of overseer, then it is the duty of the body to make this a foremost issue of prayer.

    My experience is that men do not desire this as they should for two reasons.

    1)No one has truly called them to it. Timothy and Titus were instructed to teach and exhort men to eldership. If we don't call out specific men and preach on it to the body, how do we expect them to know? We have the word because it is profitable for all things, including calling men to eldership.

    2)They have only seen it modeled poorly. Either they have only seen elders making decisions and no disciples or they have seen elders beaten up and bruised by their churches. This is not an exciting calling whatsoever. The passion and zeal are not there. We must model eldership, whether we have the title or not, so that other men will look at us and say, that is an exemplary life.

    I will pray for your situation, because the Holy Spirit is the only one who will raise up those elders that are so badly needed. I hope this has been helpful.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Stumbled across this passage on Tuesday:
    "Keep watch over yourselves and all the flock of which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers. Be shepherds of the church of God, which he bought with his own blood." Acts 20:28
    I never really paid attention to the fact that Paul says these men were made elders by the Holy Spirit. I'm assuming that he's not referring to something like tongues of fire resting on the heads of these men, but to the fact that the Holy Spirit was at work in them. It was evident to everyone in Ephesus, and it was evident to Paul, as someone who was also led by the Holy Spirit.
    There is much more to point out about the office of elder (overseer) in that passage, which I often neglect to consider when it comes time to "appoint" elders.
    I have so much more to say on this stuff, but the long and short of it would be, that I agree with almost everything you said here. My by questions revolve around whether or not we ought to boldly revise our current practice of installing elders or simply work within the parameters that are already in place. Not sure how you do it at Round Lake, but our process warrants some tweaking (at least that's how I feel about it today) :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dan, that passage is influential on my stance with eldership. The Holy Spirit raises up elders, we simply recognize His work. I also love that there is this understanding that the church is God's church, bought with His blood. There should be much fear in be willing to say, yeah I'm ready to shepherd those people.

    We are working through this process. Through resignations and health issues, we went from 6 elders to 1 in less than a year. On the surface this seems disastrous, but the reality is that it opens up the opportunity to seek out what God wants for us. We are learning how elders are recognized out of the everyday stuff of life (not just who is the nicest or been here the longest.)

    I encourage you in taking a look at this process. It might kill you in the process or it might be the greatest service you could ever do for your people. Praying for you. If you'd like to talk more about it sometime, let me know.

    ReplyDelete